Info

A working photographer based in Atlanta, Georgia.

more on the Nikon D800 based on some pixel peepinghttp://chsvimg.nikon.com/lineup/dslr/d800/img/sample01/img_01_l.jpg

I just opened this Nikon supplied image in Photoshop to see the Camera Data. See the attached screen shot.

At this point we don’t know if the photo was shot as a JPEG (and was what compression level, color space, etc.) or as non-compressed, lossly compressed, or lossy compressed 12 bit or 14 bit per channel NEF file, and if it was originally a NEF, how it was processed. The original was processed in Capture NX 2.3.0 W software and what level of JPEG compression (or possibly multiple JPEG compressions were used to prep the file for internet distribution.

For Epson printers: At 360ppi the non-interpolated print size is 20.444 x 13.644 inches, but as been proven to most people’s satisfaction the Epsons can do a damn fine job with Luster and gloss papers with files @ 180ppi and that yields a 40.889 x 27.289 inch print – but of course how good the print is will depend on the skills of the person making the print.

If you print at 300 dpi (Canon and I believe HP) you get a 24.533 x 16.373 inch print. With my Canon iPF 6300 imagePROGRAF I feel the bottom limit before start to see printing process artifacts is in the 200-225dpi range.
I really want to know both the image processing and JPEG compression parameters. I suspect some fine detail is being lost in the JPEG compression process. As the late Bruce Fraser pointed out “Difference is detail” and both JPEG compression and using only 8 bit per channel (required by JPEG compression) both forcefully eliminates close differences.

Advertisements

Comments

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS